INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS CONTROL TECHNOLOGY IX CONFERENCETECHNICAL SEMINAR – SELECTED PAPERS |
||
| 1. | 2011 Emissions Summary | |
| A. | MINI WORKSHOPS | ||
| A.1. | Trinity Compliance Workshop | ||
| A.2. | Stoker Workshops | ||
| A.2a | Stoker Workshop A | ||
| A.2b | Stoker Workshop B | ||
| B. | FORUMS | ||
| B.1. | Informal Owners’ Only Forum – see summary | ||
| B.2. | Informal Equipment Suppliers, Engineering and Environmental Service Consultants’ Only Forum – see summary | ||
| B.3. | Review of Concurrent Forum Discussions – see summary | ||
| C. | State & Federal Officials Shirt Sleeve Information Session | |
| D. | Fundamentals of Combustion and Pollutant Formation | |
| E. | Environmental Rules, Regulations and Implementation in the Industrial Sector A Panel Discussion |
|
| E.1. | US EPA Energy Strategies Group | |
| E.2. | State of Maine DEP Perspective | |
| E.3. | Ozone Transport Commission Stationary and Area Source Committee Activities | |
| E.4. | View from the Plant | |
| F. | Particulate & Multi-Emissions Control Technologies for HCl, SO2 and Hg Compliance or Advantage Back-end Technologies to Meet Future Regulations |
||
| F.1. | Co-Firing Alternate Fuels and Emission Control Strategies | ||
| F.2. | Ceramic Filter Technology for Boiler MACT and CISWI Compliance | ||
| F.3. | Mobotec Boiler MACT Solutions | ||
| F.4. | Dioxin/Furon Removal with Activated Carbon Injection | ||
| F.5. | HCI and SO2 Mitigation on a Biomass Boiler | ||
| F.6. | Enhanced Capture of Mercury Using Novel Filter Design | ||
| F.7. | Forward Thinking Air Emission Solutions | ||
| F.8. | Dry Sorbent Injection for SO2 HCL and Hg Mitigation | ||
| G. | Fundamentals of Mercury and Criteria Pollutant Monitoring |
| H. | Compliance Testing Panel | |||
| H.1. | Boiler MACT Compliance Requirements for Area and Major Sources | |||
| H.2. | Overview of Stack Testing, Monitoring & Controls for Boiler MACT | |||
| 2.a | Stack Monitoring & Stack Testing | |||
| 2.b | Particulate Testing Method Issues | |||
| 2.c | The Protocol Gas Verification Program: 9 years later it is finally here! | |||
| I. | Sorbent Considerations for ICI Boilers | ||
| I.1 | HCI SO2 Mitigation with Sodium Dry Injection | ||
| I.2 | Calcium DSI for Acid Gas Control | ||
| I.3 | Sorbent Considerations for ICI Boilers | ||
| J. | Complying with Work Practice Standards for Boiler MACT | ||
| J.1. | Boiler Tuning Requirements under MACT | ||
| J.2. | Energy Assesment Protocol Development for Boiler MACT | ||
| J.3. | Advances in Combustion and Boiler Design | ||
| J.4. | Stoichiometric Modeling and Staged Combustion Strategies for Stoker Boilers | ||
| J.5. | Engineered Compliance Coal Fuels | ||
| K. | Strategic Energy/Environmental Management Panel | ||
| K.1. | Energy Management | ||
| K.2. | Industrial Boiler MACT Compliance Strategy | ||
| K.3. | Strategic Directions in the Electric Utility Industry Highlights of 2011 Survey Results |
||
| Council of Industrial Boiler Owners REGULATORY WORKSHOP |
| TECHNICAL SEMINAR – SELECTED PAPERS
|
| 1. | Workshop Summary | |
| Carl R. Bozzuto, ALSTOM Power, Inc. | ||
| 2. | Fundamentals of Working with State Regulators | |
| Charles (Charlie) Carter, Troutman Sanders LLP | ||
| A. | What Have I Heard This Week? | ||
| A.1. | Equipment Supplier (see summary) | ||
| Vincent Albanese, Fuel Tech, Inc. | |||
| A.2. | Boiler Owner/Operator | ||
| John C. deRuyter, E.I. DuPont de Nemours Company | |||
| A.3. | Environmental Support – Can Industry Comply | ||
| Robert Fraser, ERM | |||
| A.4. | State Regulator | ||
| Catherine Beahm, N.H. Dept. Environmental Services | |||
| A.5. | Independent Consultant (see summary) | ||
| Norbert Wright, Energy Consultant | |||