Industrial Emissions Control Technology XI – August 5-7, 2013
Natural Gas Conversion Workshop
August 8, 2013
| A. | Regulatory Review (Boiler MACT Overview Christi Wilson, Trinity Consultants, Inc. |
|
| B. | FORUMS | ||
| B.1. | Informal Owners’ Only Forum | ||
| B.2. | Informal Equipment Suppliers, Engineering and Environmental Service Consultants’ Only Forum | ||
| B.3. | Review of Concurrent Forum Discussions – | ||
| C. | Short Course – Basic Principles of Combustion that Affect Plant Operation and Ultimately Affect Emissions Produced Carl Bozzuto, ALSTOM Power, Inc. |
|
| D. | Environmental Rules, Regulations and Implementation in the Industrial Sector A Panel DiscussionJames (Jim) Eddinger, EPA Andrew (Andy) Bodnarik, OTC Marc Cone, State of Maine Betsy Natz, New Executive Director from ICAC Scott Darling, Alcoa, Inc. |
|
| E. | Particulate & Multi-Emissions Control Technologies for HCl, SO2 and Hg Compliance or Advantage Back-end Technologies to Meet Future Regulations |
||
| E.1. | Review of the MACT Database and Projects/Costs Amy Marshall, URS |
||
| E.2. | The Real Costs of Operating Pollution Control Equipment Byron Nichols, Virginia Tech |
||
| E.3. | Case Study for Installation and Startup of an Advanced Overfire Air System to Reduce Carbon Monoxide to MACT Compliance Levels While Maintaining NOx at Current Levels, etc. Edmundo Vasquez, Clyde Bergemann Power Group |
||
| E.4. | The Application and Performance Results of the Gas Suspension Absorber for Achieving MACT Compliance Mike Widico, KC Cottrell |
||
| E.5. | WESP for PM2.5/SO3 Control after a Wet Scrubber – What is a WESP, How it Works James (Buzz) Reynolds, Siemens Energy, Inc. |
||
| E.6. | UltraCat Ceramic Filter System Results for Meeting Boiler MACT Rod J. Gravley, Tri-Mer |
||
| F. | Dry Sorbent Injection Panel/Presentation John C. deRuyter, E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Company, Moderator |
|
| F.1. | Mercury Removal in Dry Scrubbers Coal-Fired Generators with Amended Silicates Jim Butz, Novinda |
|
| F.2. | Dry Sorbent Injection Including Activated Carbon for HCl and Mercury Mitigation to Meet the New IB MACTS Limit Keith Day, Nol-Tec |
|
| F.3. | Recent Startups of Sodium DSl Systems Including Equipment and Sorbent Requirements, Capital and Operating Costs Michael Atwell, Solvay Chemicals |
|
| F.4. | Illustrate Some of the Factors that Should be Evaluated when Considering DSl and HCl Control at Industrial Boilers Gerald Hunt, ADA-ES |
|
| F.5. | The Growth of Dry Sorbent Injection (DSI) and The Impacts on Coal Combustion Residue Melissa Sewell, Lhoist North America |
|
| G. | How All of the Back-end Technologies Play Together… Efficiency Impacts, Electrical Impacts, etc. Kevin Dougherty, Fuel Tech, Inc. |
|||
| H. | Compliance with BMACT Isn’t the End of the Road – NAAQS and SIP Rules Have to be Integrated; also, GHG Review Through Permitting Projects Intended for BMACT Compliance – Panel Discussion William (Bill) Campbell III, AECOM Environment Robert (Bob) Fraser, ERM Brian Bird, HDR |
|||
| I. | Knowledge, Experience and Technology Transfer from Cement MACT to BMACT: Lessons Learned Kristine Davies, Trinity Consultants, Inc. |
|||
| J. | Compliance Planning – CEMs, Record Keeping and Reporting, Internal Auditing, etc.; Project Timeline and Scheduling (advance planning, coordination, etc.) Include OWNER in session Moderator: Daniel (Dan) Todd, Air Quality Services Bob Davis, Airgas Mousa Zada, Altech Environment U.S.A, Equipment Supplier |
|||
| Boiler MACT: Beyond the Emissions Limits – Strategies for Compliance | ||||
| K. | Boiler Tune-Ups Cheryl Brown, Cornell University |
|||
| L. | Energy Assessments and Tune-Up Compliance – OWNER Case Study Amy Marshall, URS |
|||
| M. | Tune-Ups & Energy Assessment – OWNER Case Study Brian Petermann, Sega, Inc. |
|||
| N. | Case Study: How a Successful Load Displacement or Behind the Meter Martin Lensink, CEM Engineering |
|||
| O. | Cause and Effect of Mill Operation and Coals on the Combustion Process and the Resulting Emissions and Furnace Effects Alan Paschedag, Siemens |
|||
| P. | CHP – Is IT The Profitable Solution to Industrial Boiler MACT? Presentations and Panel Discussion Matt Speer, Primary Energy Michael Trupin, Trinity Consultants, Inc. Chris Lyons, Solar Turbines |
|||
NATURAL GAS CONVERSION WORKSHOP
| Q. | Gas Conversion – The Non-Coal Fuel Pathway for Handling Regulatory Uncertainty and Compliance Mark Dittus and Ajay Kasarabada, Black & Veatch Corporation |
|||
| R. | Challenges when Converting Coal-Fired Boilers to Natural Gas Stephen Black, Riley Power Inc. a Babcock Power Inc. Company |
|||
| S. | Gas Conversion Story Rhett McLaren, Penn State University |
|||
| T. | The NG Conversion Story Jason Philpott, Eastman Chemical |
|||
| U. | The Gas Fired Boiler Today – Panel Moderator: Bob Bessette, CIBOHarry Kumpula, Rentech Florian Wisinski, Cleaver Brooks TBD, The Babcock & Wilcox Generation Group |
|||
| V. | Natural Gas Burners for New Unit & Conversion Applications William (Bill) Gurski, Zeeco, Inc. |
|||
| W. | What is Needed Between the LDC and the Plant? Chad Millinor and Jeff Francis, First Cut Design and Fabrication |
|||
| X. | Stoker Fired Boiler Conversions Jim Feese, Detroit Stoker Co. |
|||
| Y. | Case Study Citizens Energy Group Conversion Brian Bird, HDR Engineering Jason Kloess, EIT/HDR Engineering |
|||
| Z. | Working with the States for MACT Compliance Jeff Underhill, State of New Hampshire Cathy Beahm, State of New Hampshire |
|||